THE
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐ | ||
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | ||
☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials | |
☐ | Soliciting Material §240.14a-12 |
Oaktree Strategic Income Corporation
☒ | No fee required. | |||
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and0-11. | |||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
|
Oaktree Strategic Income Corporation
Your
statement.
Sincerely, |
/s/ |
Chief Executive Officer |
This 2018 jointMarch 4, 2024.
OAKTREE STRATEGIC INCOME CORPORATION
OCSL:
OCSI: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ocsi2018
April 6, 2018,ocsl2024sm
(1:30 p.m., Eastern Time)
website: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ocsl2018, for OCSL stockholders; and
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ocsi2018, for OCSI stockholders.
ocsl2024sm.
EACH COMPANY’STHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, UNANIMOUSLYINCLUDING ALL OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S DIRECTOR NOMINEESPROPOSAL DESCRIBED IN THE ACCOMPANYING JOINT PROXY STATEMENT AND “FOR” THE PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR SUCH COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2018.
STATEMENT.
Internet, by telephone or by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card.
We are not aware of any other business or any other nominees for election as directors of either Company, that may properly be brought before the AnnualSpecial Meeting.
By order of the |
/s/ John B. Frank |
John B. Frank |
Chairman |
February 9, 2018
Page | ||||
2 | ||||
2 | ||||
2 | ||||
2 | ||||
2 | ||||
2 | ||||
2 | ||||
3 | ||||
3 | ||||
3 | ||||
3 | ||||
3 | ||||
4 | ||||
4 | ||||
4 | ||||
4 | ||||
5 | ||||
15 | ||||
15 | ||||
15 | ||||
15 | ||||
16 | ||||
Oaktree Strategic Income Corporation
Special Meeting. We encourage you to vote your shares by following the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materialsenclosed proxy card and granting a proxy (i.e.(i.e., authorizing someone to vote your shares). If you provide voting instructions, either via the Internet, by telephone or by requesting, signing, dating and returning athe enclosed proxy card, and the Company receives them in time for the AnnualSpecial Meeting, the persons named as proxies will vote your shares in the manner that you specified.
Although each Company is a separate business development company and stockholders of each Company will vote separately on the proposals contained herein, the Companies are soliciting votes through this joint proxy statement to reduce expenses to the Companies in connection with soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting.
1. To elect two directors, eachsell or otherwise issue shares of whom will serve untilits common stock at a price below its then current net asset value (“NAV”) per share, provided that the 2021 Annual Meetingnumber of Stockholders or until his successor is duly elected and qualified; and
2. To ratify the selectionshares issued does not exceed 25% of Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”its then outstanding common stock (the “Proposal”) to serve as such Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018.
EACH COMPANY’S
PROPOSAL.
the Proposal.
Election of directors.
Ratification of independent registered public accounting firm. The affirmative vote ofProposal: (1) a majority of the Company’s outstanding voting securities and (2) a majority of the Company’s votes castoutstanding voting securities that are not held by affiliated persons of the Company. For purposes of the Proposal, the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), defines a majority of the outstanding voting securities as the vote of the lesser of: (1) 67% or more of the voting securities of the Company present at the AnnualSpecial Meeting, is required to ratifyif the appointmentholders of EY to serve as such Company’s independent registered public accounting firm (i.e., the number of shares voted “for” the ratificationmore than 50% of the appointment of EY exceeds the number of votes “against” the ratificationoutstanding voting securities of the appointmentCompany are present or represented by proxy and (2) more than 50% of EY).the outstanding voting securities of the Company. The outstanding shares of common stock represent the Company’s outstanding voting securities. Abstentions, and brokernon-votes, if any, will not be included in determininghave the numbereffect of votes cast and, as a result, will have no effect on this proposal.
Each
4, 2024. Name (Company or Companies) Interested Director: John B. Frank (OCSL; OCSI) Independent Directors: Richard Cohen (OCSI) Richard P. Dutkiewicz (OCSL)(1) Marc H. Gamsin (OCSL; OCSI) Craig Jacobson (OCSL; OCSI) Richard G. Ruben (OCSL; OCSI) Bruce Zimmerman (OCSL; OCSI) Executive Officers: Mel Carlisle (OCSL; OCSI) Kimberly Larin (OCSL; OCSI) Edgar Lee (OCSL; OCSI) Mathew Pendo (OCSL; OCSI) All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group(2) 5% Holders Senvest Management, LLC(3) Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.(4) (5) Leonard M. Tannenbaum(6) (7) 5 THE COMPANY TO SELL OR OTHERWISE ISSUE SHARES OF ITS COMMON STOCK AT A PRICE BELOW ITS THEN CURRENT NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THIS PROPOSAL26, 2018,4, 2024, the beneficial ownership information of each current director, including the nomineeseach nominee for director, of both Companies,the Company, as well as eachthe Company’s executive officers, eachand the executive officers and directors as a group. There is no person known to itthe Company to beneficially own 5% or more of the outstanding shares of itsthe Company’s common stock, and the executive officers and directors as a group.stock. Percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 140,960,65178,965,350 shares of OCSL’s common stock, and 29,466,768 shares of OCSI’sthe Company’s common stock outstanding as of January 26, 2018.athe Company’s common stock is based upon filings by such persons with the SEC and other information obtained from such persons, if available.Companies believeCompany believes that each beneficial owner set forth in the table below has sole voting and investment power over the shares beneficially owned by such beneficial owner. The directors are divided into two groups — interested director and independent directors. The interested director is an “interested person” of eachthe Company as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 as amended (the “1940 Act”).Act. The address of all executive officers and directors is c/o Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation, or c/o Oaktree Strategic Income Corporation, as applicable, 333 South Grand Avenue, 28th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071. Number of Shares of Common
Stock Owned Beneficially Percentage
of Company Common Stock
Outstanding OCSL OCSI OCSL OCSI 28,784 11,876 * * N/A 33,025 N/A * 29,738 N/A * N/A — — — — 31,200 17,600 * * 30,250 23,000 * * 10,000 6,000 * * — — — — — — — — 12,000 6,000 * * 12,000 6,000 * * 153,972 103,501 * * 7,158,959 — 5.08 % — 25,910,813 7,956,767 18.4 % 27.0 % 25,634,813 7,899,167 18.2 % 26.8 % *Representsless than 1%(1)Accounts owned include shares held in a brokerage account that may be pledged as loan collateral on a margin basis.(2)Amount only includes Section 16(a) reporting persons of the Companies.(3)Based on a Schedule 13G filed by Senvest Management, LLC on November 15, 2017, Senvest Management, LLC and Richard Mashaal may be deemed to beneficially own 7,158,959 shares of OCSL common stock held by Senvest Master Fund, LP by virtue of Senvest Management, LLC’sposition as investment manager of Senvest Master Fund, LP and by Mr. Mashaal’s status as the managing member of Senvest Management, LLC, respectively. The address for Richard Mashaal and Senvest Management, LLC is 540 Madison Avenue, 32nd Floor, New York, NY 10022.(4)The address for Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. (“Oaktree”) is 333 South Grand Avenue, 28th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071. As reported on a Schedule 13D filed by Oaktree on November 1, 2017 and a Form 4 filed by Oaktree on December 15, 2017, of the OCSL shares over which Oaktree has shared voting and dispositive power, (i) 276,000 shares of OCSL common stock are held by Oaktree Capital I, L.P. and (ii) Oaktree may be deemed to beneficially own 25,634,813.404 shares of OCSL common stock pursuant to a voting agreement by and among Oaktree, Fifth Street Holdings, L.P. (“FSH”), Leonard M. Tannenbaum, the Leonard M. Tannenbaum Foundation, the Tannenbaum Family 2012 Trust and 777 West Putnam Avenue LLC.(5)As reported on a Schedule 13D filed by Oaktree on July 13, 2017, a Form 4 filed by Leonard M. Tannenbaum on November 2, 2017 and a Form 4 filed by Oaktree on December 15, 2017, of the OCSI shares over which Oaktree has shared voting and dispositive power, (i) 57,600 shares of OCSI common stock are held by Oaktree Capital I, L.P. and (ii) Oaktree may be deemed to beneficially own 7,899,167 shares of OCSI common stock pursuant to a voting agreement by and among Oaktree, FSH, Leonard M. Tannenbaum, the Leonard M. Tannenbaum Foundation and the Tannenbaum Family 2012 Trust.(6)The address for Leonard M. Tannenbaum is 777 West Putnam Avenue, 3rd Floor, Greenwich, CT 06830. As reported on the Schedule 13D/A filed by Mr. Leonard M. Tannenbaum on October 25, 2017, of the 25,634,813 shares of OCSL common stock over which Mr. Tannenbaum has shared voting and dispositive power (i) 14,643,009.404 shares of OCSL common stock are held by Mr. Tannenbaum directly; (ii) 1,251,952 shares of OCSL common stock are held by the Leonard M. Tannenbaum Foundation, for which Mr. Tannenbaum serves as the President; (iii) 1,122,281 shares of OCSL common stock are held by 777 West Putnam Avenue LLC, for which Mr. Tannenbaum holds a majority of the equity interest of the sole member; (iv) 655,850 shares of OCSL common stock are held directly by the Leonard M. Tannenbaum 2012 Trust for the benefit of certain members of Mr. Tannenbaum’s family for which Mr. Bernard D. Berman is a trustee and (v) 7,961,721 of OCSL common stock shares are directly held by Fifth Street Holdings, L.P.(7)As reported on the Form 4 filed by Mr. Tannenbaum on November 2, 2017, of the 7,899,167 shares of OCSI common stock over which Mr. Tannenbaum has shared voting and dispositive power: (i) 5,080,544 shares of OCSI common stock are held by Mr. Tannenbaum directly; (ii) 2,668,381 of OCSI common stock shares are held by Fifth Street Holdings, L.P.; (iii) 139,367 shares of OCSI common stock are held directly by the Leonard M. Tannenbaum 2012 Trust for the benefit of certain members of Mr. Tannenbaum’s family for which Mr. Bernard D. Berman is a trustee and (iv) 10,875 shares of OCSI common stock are held by Mr. Tannenbaum’s children.As indicated above, one of OCSL’s directors holds shares in margin accounts. As of January 26, 2018, no shares in such margin accounts were pledged as loan collateral. Each Company’s securities trading policy permits share pledges in limited cases with thepre-approval of such Company’s chief compliance officer.The following table sets forth, as of January 26, 2018, the dollar range of our equity securities that is beneficially owned by each of the current directors of each Company. (Company or Companies)) Dollar RangeEquity Securities
Shares
of Common Stock
Owned Beneficially Owned(1)(2)(3)Interested Director:OCSL OCSI (OCSL; OCSI) Over $100,00054,261 $50,001 – $100,000* Richard Cohen (OCSI) N/A9,166 Over $100,000* Richard P. Dutkiewicz (OCSL) Over $100,00019,911 N/A* Marc H. Gamsin (OCSL; OCSI) — 56,757* 19,130 * 5,655 * 2,083 — Craig Jacobson (OCSL; OCSI) Over $100,00012,789 Over $100,000* Richard G. Ruben (OCSL; OCSI) Over $100,00041,698 Over $100,000* Bruce Zimmerman (OCSL; OCSI) $50,001 – $100,00010,781 $10,001 – $50,000* (1)Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule16a-1(a)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).* Represents less than 1% (1) (2)The dollar rangeOf the 54,261 shares of equity securitiesthe Company’s common stock listed as beneficially owned in us is based onby John B. Frank, (i) 14,887 shares of the closing price per share for OCSL’sCompany’s common stock are held directly by Mr. Frank and (ii) 39,374 shares of $5.09, and OCSI’sthe Company’s common stock are held by a member of $8.30, on January 26, 2018 on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.Mr. Frank’s family and he may be deemed to have voting and/or investment power with respect to, but he has no pecuniary interest in, such shares.(2) (3)The dollar rangeAmount only includes Section 16(a) reporting persons of equity securities beneficially owned are: none, $1 – $10,000, $10,001 – $50,000, $50,001 – $100,000, or over $100,000.the Company.1 — ELECTIONAUTHORIZATION OF DIRECTORS business and affairs of each Company is managedaoversight1940 Act. As a BDC, the Company is generally prohibited from issuing shares of its Board. Eachcommon stock at a price below the then-current NAV per share unless the Company meets certain conditions, including obtaining stockholder approval. As a result, the Company is seeking the approval of its stockholders so that it may, in one or more public or private offerings of its common stock, sell or otherwise issue shares of its common stock at a price below its then current NAV per share, provided that the number of shares issued does not exceed 25% of its then outstanding common stock and subject to the conditions set forth in this Proposal. If this Proposal is approved by the Company’s stockholders, the authorization would be effective for common stock issued during a twelve-month period following such approval. The authorization would include offerings in connection with acquisitions of other companies or investment portfolios.currently consistsincluding all of six members,the directors who have no financial interest in the Proposal and all of whom fivethe directors who are not “interested persons” of each suchthe Company as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. EachAct, has approved the Proposal as in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders and recommends it to the stockholders for their approval. For these purposes, directors are not deemed to have a financial interest solely by reason of their ownership of the Company’s common stock. The Board may modifybelieves that having the flexibility to sell or otherwise issue common stock below its numberthen current NAV per share in certain instances is in the Company’s best interests and the best interests of members in accordanceits stockholders. This would, among other things, provide access to the capital markets to take advantage of attractive investment and acquisition opportunities during periods of market dislocation or volatility and to add financial flexibility to comply with regulatory requirements and debt facility covenants, including any applicable asset coverage ratios. In addition, the Board noted that certain ratings agencies view stockholder authorization to issue shares of common stock below its then current NAV per share favorably. Upon obtaining the requisite stockholder approval, the Company will comply with the applicable Company’s bylaws, except that no decreaseconditions described in this proxy statement in connection with any issuance undertaken pursuant to such authorization. A discussion of the risks of dilution appears below.numberFuture Create, Attractive Investment and Acquisition Opportunitiesdirectors shall shortendisruption and instability. For example, rising interest rates, geopolitical conflicts and concerns regarding a U.S. and global recession are currently causing overall economic and financial market instability both globally and in the United States. The Company believes that favorable opportunities to invest at attractive risk-adjusted returns may be created during such periods of market dislocation and volatility, including opportunities to make acquisitions of other companies or investment portfolios at compelling value.incumbent director. The NASDAQ Global Select Marketunderwriter, dealer or agent in connection with such offering. If the current period of market dislocation and volatility continues or another period of market dislocation and volatility were to occur, the Company may not have access to sufficient debt and equity capital in order to take advantage of attractive investment and acquisition opportunities that are created during such period. In addition, the debt capital that will be available, if any, may be at a higher cost andNASDAQ”RIC”) requiresfor tax purposes, the Company needs to raise equity capital to grow its investment portfolio. As a RIC, the Company generally must distribute substantially all of its earnings to stockholders as dividends in order to qualify for the tax benefits available to RICs, which prevents the Company from retaining meaningful amounts of earnings to support operations, including making new investments. Further, as a BDC, the Company may issue “senior securities,” including borrowing money from banks or other financial institutions, only in amounts such that each Company maintain a majority of independent directors on its Board and provides that a director of a business development company is considered to be independent if he or she is not an “interested person”,the Company’s asset coverage, as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. Therefore, under both the 1940 Act, equals at least 150% after such incurrence or issuance. Certain of the Company’s debt facilities also require that it maintain such an asset coverage ratio. These limitations may prevent the Company from incurring debt to grow its investment portfolio.NASDAQ rules,to BDCs, having a majoritymore favorable asset coverage and debt to equity ratio would also generally strengthen the Company’s balance sheet, potentially improve access to the debt markets and provide greater flexibility for the Company to fully execute its business strategy.of eachwho have no financial interest in the Proposal and all of the Boards is independent.Under the restated certificate of incorporation of each of OCSL and OCSI, directors who are divided into three classes. At each annual meeting of stockholders of each Company, the successors to the directors whose terms expire at such meeting will be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders held in the third year following the year of his or her election or until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified or any director’s earlier resignation, death or removal.Messrs. Gamsin and Jacobson have been nominated forre-election to the Board of each of OCSL and OCSI for three-year terms expiring at the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of such Company. At OCSL’s Special Meeting of Stockholders on September 7, 2017, Messrs. Gamsin and Jacobson were elected to OCSL’s Board for a term commencing on October 17, 2017. At OCSI’s Special Meeting of Stockholders on September 7, 2017, Messrs. Gamsin and Jacobson were elected to OCSI’s Board for a term commencing on October 17, 2017.No person being nominated by either Company as a director is being proposed for election pursuant to any agreement or understanding between any such person and that Company.Any stockholder of OCSL or OCSI can vote for or withhold on eachnot “interested persons” of the director nominees of OCSL or OCSI, respectively. Votes to “withhold authority” and brokernon-votes will not be included in determining the number of votes cast and, as a result, will have no effect on the election of the director nominees. In the absence of instructions to the contrary, it is the intention of the persons named as proxies to vote such proxyFOR the election of the nominees named above. If a nominee should decline or be unable to serve as a director, it is intended that the proxy will be voted for the election of such person nominated by the applicable Board as a replacement. Neither Board has any reason to believe that any director nominee named will be unable or unwilling to serve.Each Company’s Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” each of the applicable Company’s director nominees described in this joint proxy statement.Director and Executive Officer InformationInformation regarding each Company’s nominees for election as a director at the Annual Meeting and each Company’s continuing directors is as follows:Name, Address, andAge(1)CompanyServedCompany – Length oftime served;Term of officePrincipal Occupation(s)During the Past Five YearsOther Directorships Held byDirector or Nominee DirectorDuring the Past Five Years(2)Interested DirectorJohn B. Frank (61)OCSL and OCSIOCSL-Director since 2017; term expires in 2020OCSI-Director since 2017; term expires in 2020Oaktree’s Vice Chairman since 2014 and Managing Principal from 2006 to 2014.A member of the board of directors of Oaktree Capital Group, LLC (“OCG”) since 2007 and Chevron Corporation since October 2017.Independent DirectorsRichard W. Cohen (63)OCSIOCSI-Director since 2016; term expires in 2019Partner in the law firm of Lowey Dannenberg, P.C. since 2015 and President from 2008 to 2014.Director of Crossroads Capital, Inc. from July 2015 to June 2016. Served as a director of MGT Capital Company from 2012 to 2013.Richard P. Dutkiewicz (62)OCSLOCSL-Director since 2010; term expires in 2019Independent financial and operational adviser since March 2012; Managing Director at Capital Insight, LLC, from March 2013 to November 2013. Independent financial and management consultant affiliated with Exxedus Capital Partners from September 2012 to March 2013.Member of the OCSI Board from May 2013 to October 2017. Served on the board of directors of Motor Sport Country Club Holdings, Inc., from May 2010 to April 2013.Marc H. Gamsin* (62)OCSL and OCSIOCSL-Director since 2017; term expires, if elected, in 2021OCSI-Director since 2017; term expires, if elected, in 2021Head of AllianceBernstein’s Alternative Investment Management Group from 2010 to December 2017.Serves on the board of directors of Bet Tzedek and the board of trustees of Skirball Cultural Center.Name, Address, andAge(1)CompanyServedCompany – Length oftime served;Term of officePrincipal Occupation(s)During the Past Five YearsOther Directorships Held byDirector or Nominee DirectorDuring the Past Five Years(2)Craig Jacobson* (65)OCSL and OCSIOCSL-Director since 2017; term expires, if elected, in 2021OCSI-Director since 2017; term expires, if elected, in 2021Partner of the law firm of Hansen, Jacobson, Teller, Hoberman, Newman, Warran, Richman, Rush, Kaller & Gellman LLP since 1987; Founder at New Form Digital since 2014; Founder at Whisper Advisors LLC since 2015.Serves on the board of directors of Tribune Entertainment, Expedia, and Charter Communications.Richard G. Ruben (62)OCSL and OCSIOCSL-Director since 2017; term expires in 2019OCSI-Director since 2017; term expires in 2019Chief Executive Officer of the Ruben Companies, a real estate development and management business, since 1982.Member of the board of overseers of Weil Cornell MedicineBruce Zimmerman (60)OCSL and OCSIOCSL-Director since 2017; term expires in 2020OCSI-Director since 2017; term expires in 2020Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of the University of Texas Investment Management Company from 2007 to October 2016.Member of the board of trustees for the CommonFund.*Director nominee of each of OCSL and OCSI.(1)The address of all directors is c/o Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation or Oaktree Strategic Income Corporation, as applicable, 333 South Grand Avenue, 28th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071.(2)Except as set forth in this table, no current director of either Company otherwise serves as a director of an investment company registered under the 1940 Act.Biographical information regarding each Company’s directors is set forth below. We have divided the directors into two groups — independent director and interested directors. The interested director is an “interested person” of each Company as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act.The following persons serveAct, has approved the Proposal as each Company’s executive officers in the following capacities:NameAgeOCSL PositionOCSI PositionEdgar Lee41Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment OfficerChief Executive Officer and Chief Investment OfficerMel Carlisle49Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerChief Financial Officer and TreasurerNameAgeOCSL PositionOCSI PositionMathew Pendo54Chief Operating OfficerChief Operating OfficerKimberly Larin49Chief Compliance OfficerChief Compliance OfficerRichard W. Cohen. Mr. Cohen has been a memberbest interests of the OCSICompany and its stockholders and recommends it to the stockholders for their approval. For these purposes, directors are not deemed to have a financial interest solely by reason of their ownership of the Company’s common stock.since April 2016. Mr. Cohenbelieves that having the flexibility to issue common stock below NAV per share in certain instances is a partnerin the best interests of Lowey Dannenberg, P.C. (“Lowey”), a law firm that represents investorsthe Company and directors in public companies, includingclosed-end funds. Mr. Cohen joined Lowey as an attorney in 1998 and servedits stockholders. During volatile periods, such as the President of Lowey from 2008current market environment, this would, among other things, provide access to 2014. Mr. Cohen was a director of Crossroads Capital, Inc., a business development company, from July 2015capital markets to June 2016 and served as a member of the valuation, audit and nominating committees. Mr. Cohen also served as a director of MGT Capital Company, a holding company, where he was also a member of its audit committee, from 2012 to 2013. Mr. Cohen is admitted to practice law in New York and Pennsylvania, and the bars of the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 6th Circuits, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, the Eastern District of Michigan and the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Mr. Cohen received his undergraduate degree from Georgetown University and his Juris Doctor from the New York University School of Law. Mr. Cohen is a member of the National Board of Governors of the American Jewish Committee (AJC) and is the Regional President of AJC Westchester/Fairfield.Mr. Cohen’s long experience with public company and business development company legal matters have made him a valuable contributor to OCSI Board deliberations.Richard P. Dutkiewicz. Mr. Dutkiewicz has been a member of the OCSL Board since February 2010. He is an independent financial and operational adviser that works directly with private equity sponsors and hedge funds on their portfolio companies. These sponsors include Greenlight Capital Inc., KKR & Co. L.P., Sun Capital Partners, Inc. and ACON Investments, L.L.C. Prior to his current position, he was affiliated with Capital Insight, LLC, a private investment bank, from March 2013 to November 2013. Previously, he was affiliated with Exxedus Capital Partners from September 2012 to March 2013.Mr. Dutkiewicz served as a member of the OCSI Board from May 2013 to October 2017. From May 2010 to April 2013, Mr. Dutkiewicz served on the board of directors of Motor Sport Country Club Holdings, Inc., which sells balancing technology for rotating devices in the automotive industry. From April 2010 to March 2012, Mr. Dutkiewicz was the executive vice president and chief financial officer of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc., which filed for bankruptcy in October 2011. Mr. Dutkiewicz previously served as chief financial officer of Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc. from October 2003 to April 2010. From May 2003 to October 2003, Mr. Dutkiewicz was vice president-information technology of Sirenza Microdevices, Inc. In May 2003, Sirenza Microdevices, Inc. acquiredVari-L Company, Inc. From January 2001 to May 2003, Mr. Dutkiewicz was vice president-finance and chief financial officer ofVari-L Company, Inc. From April 1995 to January 2001, Mr. Dutkiewicz was vice president-finance, chief financial officer, secretary and treasurer of Coleman Natural Products, Inc., located in Denver, Colorado. Mr. Dutkiewicz’s previous experience includes senior financial management positions at Tetrad Corporation, MicroLithics Corporation and various divisions of United Technologies Corporation. Mr. Dutkiewicz began his career as an Audit Manager at KPMG LLP. Mr. Dutkiewicz received a B.B.A. degree from Loyola University of Chicago and passed the CPA exam in 1978.Through his prior experiences as a vice president and chief financial officer at several public companies, including executive vice president and chief financial officer of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc. and chief financial officer of Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc., Mr. Dutkiewicz brings business expertise, finance and audit skills to his Board service with OCSL. Mr. Dutkiewicz’s expertise, experience and skills closely align with OCSL’s operations, and his prior investment experience with managing public companies facilitates anin-depthunderstanding of our investment business. Moreover, due to Mr. Dutkiewicz’s knowledge of and experience in finance and accounting, the OCSL Board determined that Mr. Dutkiewicz is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under SEC rules. The foregoing qualifications led to the OCSL Board’s conclusion that Mr. Dutkiewicz should serve as a member of the OCSL Board.Marc H. Gamsin. Mr. Gamsin has been a member of the OCSL and OCSI Boards since October 2017. Mr. Gamsin was the head of AllianceBernstein’s Alternative Investment Management Group, a fund of funds manager focused on hedge funds and private equity funds, from 2010 to December 2017. Prior to joining AllianceBernstein in 2010, Mr. Gamsin was the president of SunAmerica Alternative Investments, which managed a large portfolio of alternative investments for SunAmerica Inc., the domestic life and retirement savings arm of American International Group. Mr. Gamsin also served as SunAmerica’s Executive Vice President and a member of its Board of Directors, and was responsible for SunAmerica’s corporate development activities and legal affairs. Prior to joining SunAmerica in 1996, Mr. Gamsin was a partner of the law firm O’Melveny & Myers, where he represented investment fund sponsors and other financial services companies. Mr. Gamsin serves on the Board of Directors of Bet Tzedek, the Board of Trustees of the Skirball Cultural Center and the investment committee of the Broad Foundations and previously served on the Investment Committee of the J. Paul Getty Trust. Mr. Gamsin received a J.D. from New York University School of Law and holds a B.A. from Queens College.Through his extensive work as an attorney representing investment fund sponsors and his positions with AllianceBernstein and SunAmerica, Mr. Gamsin brings valuable legal, business and investment expertise to his Board service with the Companies. The foregoing qualifications led to the conclusion of each Board that Mr. Gamsin should serve as a member of such Board.Craig Jacobson. Mr. Jacobson has been a member of the OCSL and OCSI Boards since October 2017. Mr. Jacobson is a founder and partner with the law firm of Hansen, Jacobson, Teller, Hoberman, Newman, Warran, Richman, Rush, Kaller & Gellman LLP where he practices in the area of media business. Mr. Jacobson founded and operates New Form Digital, a venture with Discovery Media and ITV Studios which produces scripted short form online content, and Whisper Advisors, a boutique investment banking and advisory company. Mr. Jacobson serves on the Board of Directors of Tribune Entertainment, Expedia and Charter Communications. He is a member of the Audit and Compensation Committees of Expedia and Tribune Entertainment and chairs the Compensation Committee of Tribune Entertainment. Mr. Jacobson has previously served as a director of TicketMaster, Eventful and Aver Media. Mr. Jacobson received a J.D. from the George Washington University Law School and holds a B.A. from Brown University.Through his membership of the Board of Directors of several companies, Mr. Jacobson brings extensive experience as the director of both private and public companies to the Boards. Mr. Jacobson’s services on the Audit and Compensation Committees of Expedia and Tribune Entertainment provides Mr. Jacobson with the knowledge and skills to significantly contribute to the committees of the Boards. The foregoing qualifications led to the conclusion of each Board that Mr. Jacobson should serve as a member of such Board.Richard G. Ruben. Mr. Ruben has been a member of the OCSL and OCSI Boards since October 2017. Mr. Ruben has over 25 years of experience as the Chief Executive Officer of Ruben Companies. Ruben Companies develops, manages and invests in commercial and residential properties in New York, Washington D.C. and Boston. Mr. Ruben also founded Workspeed Holdings, LLC, which developed internet-based applications for property management workflow. Mr. Ruben is a member of the Board of Overseers of Weill Cornell Medicine and has previously served on the boards of Prep for Prep, the National Building Museum and Horace Mann School. Mr. Ruben served for five years on the Real Estate Advisory Committee of the New York State Common Retirement Fund. Mr. Ruben is a graduate of Amherst College and Harvard Law School.Through his extensive executive experience with the Ruben Companies and Workspeed Holdings, LLC, Mr. Ruben brings valuable business,pursue attractive investment and leadership experienceacquisition opportunities and add financial flexibility to the Boards and the Companies. The foregoing qualifications led to the conclusion of each Board that Mr. Ruben should serve as a member of such Board.Bruce Zimmerman. Mr. Zimmerman has been a member of the OCSL and OCSI Boards since October 2017. Mr. Zimmerman was the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of the University of Texas Investment Management Company (“UTIMCO”) from 2007 until 2016. UTIMCO is the second largest investor of discretionary university assets worldwide. Before joining UTIMCO, Mr. Zimmerman was Chief Investment Officer and Global Head of Pension Investments at Citigroup. Mr. Zimmerman also served as Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer of Citigroup Alternate Investments, which invests proprietary and client capital across a range of hedge fund, private equity, real estate and structured credit vehicles. Prior to his work at Citigroup, Mr. Zimmerman spent thirteen years at Texas Commerce Bank/JP Morgan Chase in a variety of capacities including Merger & Acquisition Investment Banking, Internet and ATM Retail Management, Consumer Marketing and Financial Planning, Strategy and Corporate Department. Mr. Zimmerman is Vice Chairman of the Board of Trustees for the CommonFund, a nonprofit asset management firm, and previously served on the Investment Committee for the Houston Endowment. Mr. Zimmerman was previously the International President of the B’nai B’rith Youth Organization. Mr. Zimmerman received an MBA from Harvard Business School and graduated Magna Cum Laude from Duke University.Mr. Zimmerman’s executive experience brings extensive business, investment and management expertise to his Board service. His previous positions as Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer bring valuable financial oversight skills to the Boards. Due to such experience and Mr. Zimmerman’s knowledge of and experience in finance and accounting, each Board determined that Mr. Zimmerman is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under SEC rules. Mr. Zimmerman’s many experiences also make him skilled in leading committees requiring substantive expertise, including serving as the chair of the audit committee of each of the Boards. The foregoing qualifications led to the conclusion of each Board that Mr. Zimmerman should serve as a member of such Board.John B. Frank. Mr. Frank has been a member of the OCSL and OCSI Boards since October 2017. Mr. Frank has been Oaktree’s Vice Chairman since 2014 and has served on the board of directors of OCG since 2007. Prior to holding this position, Mr. Frank served as Oaktree’s Managing Principal from 2006 to 2014 and served as Oaktree’s General Counsel from 2001 to 2006. As Managing Principal of Oaktree, Mr. Frank was the firm’s principal executive officer and was responsible for all aspects of the firm’s management. Prior to joining Oaktree, Mr. Frank was a partner of the law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, where he managed a number of notable mergers and acquisitions transactions. While at that firm, he served as primary outside counsel to public and privately-held corporations and as special counsel to various boards of directors and special board committees. Prior to joining Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP in 1984, Mr. Frank served as a law clerk to the Honorable Frank M. Coffin of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. He is a member of the State Bar of California and, while in private practice, was listed in Woodward & White’sBest Lawyers in America. Mr. Frank is a member of the Board of Directors of Chevron Corporation and a Trustee of Wesleyan University, Polytechnic School, Good Samaritan Hospital of Los Angeles and the XPRIZE Foundation. Mr. Frank holds a B.A. with honors from Wesleyan University and a J.D.magna cum laude from the University of Michigan Law School where he was Managing Editor of theMichigan Law Review and a member of the Order of the Coif.Mr. Frank’s position as Oaktree’s Vice Chairman and member of the board of directors of OCG and prior positions as Oaktree’s Managing Principal and General Counsel gives him deep knowledge of Oaktree’s operations, capabilities and business relationships. Mr. Frank’s experience as counsel to board of directors and special board committees brings valuable legal insight to the Boards. The foregoing qualifications led to the conclusion of each Board that Mr. Frank should serve as a member of such Board.Edgar Lee. Mr. Lee has served as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of OCSL and OCSI since October 2017. Mr. Lee has been a Managing Director at Oaktree and has served as the portfolio managerfor Oaktree’s Strategic Credit strategy since 2013. From 2010 to 2013, Mr. Lee was a Senior Vice President within Oaktree’s Distressed Debt group and led a number of the group’s investments in the media, technology and telecom industries. Prior to joining Oaktree in 2007, Mr. Lee worked within the Investment Banking division at UBS Investment Bank in Los Angeles, where he was responsible for advising clients on a number of debt and preferred stock restructurings, leveraged financings,buy-side and sell-side M&A, mezzanine financings and recapitalizations. Before that, he was employed within the Fixed Income division at Lehman Brothers Inc. Prior experience includes work at Katzenbach Partners LLP and the Urban Institute. Mr. Lee serves as a director of Neo Performance Materials and previously served on the boards of Nine Entertainment and Charter Communications. Mr. Lee received a B.A. degree in economics from Swarthmore College and an M.P.P. with a concentration in applied economics from Harvard University.Mel Carlisle. Mr. Carlisle has served as Chief Financial Officer of OCSL and OCSI since October 2017 and Treasurer of OCSL and OCSI since November 2017. Mr. Carlisle has been a Managing Director and Head of the Distressed Debt fund accounting team within theClosed-end Funds accounting group at Oaktree since 2006. He joined Oaktree in 1995. Prior thereto, Mr. Carlisle was a manager in the Client and Fund Reporting Department of The TCW Group, Inc. Previously, he was employed in the Financial Services Group in Price Waterhouse’s Los Angeles office. Mr. Carlisle received a B.A. degree in economics and accounting from Claremont McKenna College. He is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive).Mathew Pendo. Mr. Pendo has served as the Chief Operating Officer of OCSL and OCSI since October 2017 and currently serves as Managing Director, Head of Corporate Development and Capital Markets for Oaktree, which he joined in 2015. Prior to joining Oaktree, Mr. Pendo was at the investment banking boutique of Sandler O’Neill Partners, where he was a managing director focused on the financial services industry. Prior thereto, Mr. Pendo was the chief investment officer of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, where he was honored with the Distinguished Service Award. There, he built and managed a team of 20 professionals overseeing the Treasury’s $200 billion TARP investment activities across multiple industries including AIG, GM and the banks, and all levels of the capital structure. Mr. Pendo began his career at Merrill Lynch, where he spent 18 years, starting in their investment banking division before becoming managing director of the technology industry group. Subsequently, Mr. Pendo was a managing director at Barclays Capital, first serving asco-head of U.S. Investment Banking and thenco-head of Global Industrials group. He received a bachelor’s degree in economics from Princeton University, cum laude and is a board member of SuperValu Inc.Kimberly Larin.Ms. Larin has served as Chief Compliance Officer of OCSL and OCSI since October 2017 and currently serves as a Managing Director in Compliance for Oaktree and the Chief Compliance Officer of Oaktree’s mutual funds. Prior to joining Oaktree in 2002, Ms. Larin spent six years at Western Asset Management Company as a compliance officer. Ms. Larin received a B.S. degree in business administration with an emphasis in marketing from Oklahoma State University.Each Board monitors and performs oversight roles with respect to the applicable Company’s business and affairs, including with respect to investment practices and performance, compliancecomply with regulatory requirements and debt facility covenants, including the services,applicable asset coverage ratios. It could also minimize the likelihood that the Company would be required to sell assets that the Company would not otherwise sell, which sales could occur at times and at prices that are disadvantageous to the Company and its stockholders.
(Discount) of
High Sales Price
to NAV (2)
(Discount) of
Low Sales Price
to NAV (2) $ 20.55 $ 16.98 $ 13.56 (17.4 )% (34.0 )% $ 21.27 $ 19.08 $ 16.41 (10.3 )% (22.8 )% $ 21.66 $ 20.76 $ 18.57 (4.2 )% (14.3 )% $ 21.84 $ 22.20 $ 19.74 1.6 % (9.6 )% $ 22.03 $ 22.86 $ 21.09 3.8 % (4.3 )% $ 21.79 $ 23.43 $ 21.39 7.5 % (1.8 )% $ 20.67 $ 22.83 $ 18.60 10.4 % (10.0 )% $ 20.38 $ 21.75 $ 17.61 6.7 % (13.6 )% $ 19.63 $ 21.69 $ 17.58 10.5 % (10.4 )% $ 19.66 $ 21.48 $ 17.70 9.3 % (10.0 )% $ 19.58 $ 20.05 $ 17.99 2.4 % (8.1 )% $ 19.63 $ 20.71 $ 19.24 5.5 % (2.0 )% * $ 20.79 $ 18.41 * * * $ 21.12 $ 20.24 * * Not determinable at the time of filing. (1) NAV per share is determined as of the last day in the relevant quarter and therefore may not reflect the NAV per share on the date of the high and low sales prices. The NAVs shown are based on outstanding shares at the end of each period. (2) Calculated as the respective high or low sales price less NAV per share, divided by NAV per share.
Underoffering and level of discount increases. Further, if current stockholders do not purchase any shares to maintain their percentage interest, regardless of whether such offering is above or below NAV per share, their voting power will be diluted.
chairman and reorganize its leadership structure, from time to time,which any discounted offering is made will include a chart for these examples based on the criteria that isactual number of shares in such Company’s best interestsoffering and the best interests of such Company’s stockholders at such times. Each Board has established corporate governance procedures to guard against, among other things, an improperly constituted Board. Pursuant to each Company’s Corporate Governance Policy, wheneveractual discount from the chairman of such Boardmost recently determined NAV per share. It is not possible to predict the level of market price decline that may occur. These examples are provided for illustrative purposes only.
Prior to Sale Below NAV | Example 1 5% Offering at 5% Discount | Example 2 10% Offering at 10% Discount | Example 3 25% Offering at 25% Discount | Example 4 25% Offering at 100% Discount | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Following Sale | % Change | Following Sale | % Change | Following Sale | % Change | Following Sale | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Offering Price | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Price per share to public | — | $ | 10.00 | — | $ | 9.47 | — | $ | 7.89 | — | $ | 0.00 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net proceeds per share to issuer | — | $ | 9.50 | — | $ | 9.00 | — | $ | 7.50 | — | $ | 0.00 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Decrease to NAV | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total shares outstanding | 1,000,000 | 1,050,000 | 5.00 | % | 1,100,000 | 10.00 | % | 1,250,000 | 25.00 | % | 1,250,000 | 25.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
NAV per share | $ | 10.00 | $ | 9.98 | (0.20 | )% | $ | 9.91 | (0.90 | )% | $ | 9.50 | (5.00 | )% | $ | 8.00 | (20.00 | )% |
Prior to Sale Below NAV | Example 1 5% Offering at 5% Discount | Example 2 10% Offering at 10% Discount | Example 3 25% Offering at 25% Discount | Example 4 25% Offering at 100% Discount | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Following Sale | % Change | Following Sale | % Change | Following Sale | % Change | Following Sale | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dilution to Stockholder | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares held by Stockholder A | 10,000 | 10,000 | — | 10,000 | — | 10,000 | — | 10,000 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage held by Stockholder A | 1.00 | % | 0.95 | % | (5.00 | )% | 0.91 | % | (9.00 | )% | 0.80 | % | (20.00 | )% | 0.80 | % | (20.00 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Asset Values | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total net asset value held by Stockholder A | $ | 100,000 | $ | 99,800 | (0.20 | )% | $ | 99,100 | (0.90 | )% | $ | 95,000 | (5.00 | )% | $ | 80,000 | (20.00 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||
Total investment by Stockholder A (assumed to be $10.00 per Share) | $ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 | — | $ | 100,000 | — | $ | 100,000 | — | $ | 100,000 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total dilution to Stockholder A (total NAV less total investment) | — | $ | (200 | ) | — | $ | (900 | ) | — | $ | (5,000 | ) | — | $ | (20,000 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Amounts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NAV held by Stockholder A | — | $ | 9.98 | — | $ | 9.91 | — | $ | 9.50 | — | $ | 8.00 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment per share held by Stockholder A (assumed to be $10.00 per share on shares held prior to sale) | $ | 10.00 | $ | 10.00 | — | $ | 10.00 | — | $ | 10.00 | — | $ | 10.00 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dilution per share held by Stockholder A (NAV less investment per share) | — | $ | (0.02 | ) | — | $ | (0.09 | ) | — | $ | (0.50 | ) | — | $ | (2.00 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Percentage dilution to Stockholder A (dilution per share divided by investment per share) | — | — | (0.20 | )% | — | (0.90 | )% | — | (5.00 | )% | — | (20.00 | )% |
Prior to Sale Below NAV | 50% Participation | 150% Participation | ||||||||||||||||||
Following Sale | % Change | Following Sale | % Change | |||||||||||||||||
Offering Price | ||||||||||||||||||||
Price per share to public | — | $ | 7.89 | — | $ | 7.89 | — | |||||||||||||
Net proceeds per share to issuer | — | $ | 7.50 | — | $ | 7.50 | — | |||||||||||||
Increases in Shares and Decrease to NAV | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total shares outstanding | 1,000,000 | 1,250,000 | 25.00 | % | 1,250,000 | 25.00 | % | |||||||||||||
NAV per share | $ | 10.00 | $ | 9.50 | (5.00 | )% | $ | 9.50 | (5.00 | )% | ||||||||||
(Dilution)/Accretion to Participating Stockholder A | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shares held by Stockholder A | 10,000 | 11,250 | 12.50 | % | 13,750 | 37.50 | % | |||||||||||||
Percentage held by Stockholder A | 1.00 | % | 0.90 | % | (10.00 | )% | 1.10 | % | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||
Total Asset Values | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total NAV held by Stockholder A | $ | 100,000 | $ | 106,875 | 6.88 | % | $ | 130,625 | 30.63 | % | ||||||||||
Total investment by Stockholder A (assumed to be $10.00 per share on shares held prior to sale) | $ | 100,000 | $ | 109,863 | 9.86 | % | $ | 129,588 | 29.59 | % | ||||||||||
Total (dilution)/accretion to Stockholder A (total NAV less total investment) | — | $ | (2,988 | ) | — | $ | 1,037 | — | ||||||||||||
Per Share Amounts | ||||||||||||||||||||
NAV held by Stockholder A | — | $ | 9.50 | — | $ | 9.50 | — | |||||||||||||
Investment per share held by Stockholder A (assumed to be $10.00 per share on shares held prior to sale) | $ | 10.00 | $ | 9.77 | (2.30 | )% | $ | 9.42 | (5.80 | )% | ||||||||||
(Dilution)/accretion per share held by Stockholder A (NAV less investment per share) | — | $ | (0.27 | ) | — | $ | 0.08 | — | ||||||||||||
Percentage (dilution)/accretion to Stockholder A (dilution/accretion per share divided by investment per share) | — | — | (2.76 | )% | — | 0.85 | % |
Presently, Mr. John B. Frank serves as the Chairman of eachsize of the Boards. Mr. Frank’s familiarity with Oaktree’s investment platformoffering and extensive knowledgelevel of discounts increases.
As previously disclosed in their respective Annual Reports on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017, each Company has identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting because such Company did not design or maintain effective controls to internally communicate current accounting policies and procedures including the nature of supporting documentation required to validate certain portfolio company data. However, each Company does not believe such identification of a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting was the result of a deficiency in Board oversight or independence because, among other things, the members of such Company’s Audit Committee, including the chairman, are all independent directors and provide appropriate oversight of such Company’s financial reporting and financial statements. Remediation actions with respect to this material weakness remain in progress.
Each Company’s corporate governance practices include regular meetings of its independent directors in executive session without the presence of interested directors and management, the establishment of an Audit Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation Committee comprised solely of independent directors and the appointment of a chief compliance officer, with whom the independent directors of such Company meet with in executive session at least once a year, for administering the Company’s compliance policies and procedures. While certainnon-management members of each Board may participate on the boards of directors of other public companies, each Company monitors such participation to ensure it is not excessive and does not interfere with their duties to such Company.
Boards’ Role In Risk Oversight
Each Board performs its risk oversight function primarily through (i) four standing committees, which report to the applicable Board and, with the exception of theCo-Investment Committee, are comprised solely of independent directors, and (ii) active monitoring by such Company’s chief compliance officer and its compliance policies and procedures.
As described below in more detail, each Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee andCo-Investment Committee assists the applicable Board in fulfilling its risk oversight responsibilities. Each Audit Committee’s risk oversight responsibilities include overseeing the applicable Company’s accounting and financial reporting processes, systems of internal controls regarding finance and accounting, and audits of the applicable Company’s financial statements, as well as the establishment of guidelines and making recommendations to the applicable Board regarding the valuation of the applicable Company’s loans and investments. Each Compensation Committee’s risk oversight responsibilities include reviewing and approving the reimbursement by the applicable Company of the compensation of its chief financial officer and chief compliance officer and their staffs and othernon-investment professionals at Oaktree
that perform duties for such Company. Each Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s risk oversight responsibilities include selecting, researching and nominating directors for election by the applicable Company’s stockholders, developing and recommending to the applicable Board a set of corporate governance principles and overseeing the evaluation of such Board and management.
Each Board also performs its risk oversight responsibilities with the assistance of such Company’s chief compliance officer. Each Board annually reviews a written report from the Company’s chief compliance officer discussing the adequacy and effectiveness of the compliance policies and procedures of each respective Company. The chief compliance officer’s annual report addresses: (i) the operation of the compliance policies and procedures of the Company, its investment adviser and certain other entities since the last report; (ii) any material changes to such policies and procedures since the last report; (iii) any recommendations for material changes to such policies and procedures as a result of the chief compliance officer’s annual review; and (iv) any compliance matter that has occurred since the date of the last report about which the Board would reasonably need to know to oversee compliance. In addition, each Company’s chief compliance officer meets in executive session with the applicable Board’s independent directors at least once a year.
Each Company believes that the role of the Board in risk oversight is effective and appropriate given the extensive regulation to which it is already subject as a business development company. As business development companies, the Companies are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements that control the levels of risk in their respective businesses and operations.
Transactions with Related Persons
Asdiscount from NAV: (1) an offering of October 17, 2017, each Company is externally managed by Oaktree pursuant to an investment advisory agreement (each, an “Investment Advisory Agreement” and together, the “Investment Advisory Agreements”). Mr. John B. Frank, an interested member of each Board, has a direct or indirect pecuniary interest in Oaktree. Oaktree is a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, that is partially and indirectly owned by OCG.
Under OCSL’s Investment Advisory Agreement, fees payable to Oaktree equal (a) a base management fee of 1.50% of the value of OCSL’s total gross assets, including any investment made with borrowings, but excluding cash and cash equivalents, and (b) an incentive fee based on OCSL’s performance. The incentive fee consists of two parts. The first part is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears and equals 17.5% of OCSL’s“pre-incentive fee net investment income” for the immediately preceding quarter, subject to a preferred return, or “hurdle,” and a “catch up” feature. The second part will be determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of OCSL’s Investment Advisory Agreement) commencing with the fiscal year ending September 30, 2019 and will equal 17.5% of OCSL’s realized capital gains, if any, on a cumulative basis from the beginning of the fiscal year ending September 30, 2019 through the end of each fiscal year, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fees. Any realized capital gains, realized capital losses, unrealized capital appreciation and unrealized capital depreciation with respect to OCSL’s portfolio as of the end of the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018 will be excluded from the calculations of the second part of the incentive fee.
Under OCSI’s Investment Advisory Agreement, fees payable to Oaktree equal (a) a base management fee of 1.00% of the value of OCSI’s total gross assets, including any investment made with borrowings, but excluding cash and cash equivalents, and (b) an incentive fee based on OCSI’s performance. The incentive fee consists of two parts. The first part is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears and equals 17.5% of OCSI’s“pre-incentive fee net investment income” for the immediately preceding quarter, subject to a preferred return, or “hurdle,” and a “catch up” feature. The second part will be determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of OCSI’s Investment Advisory Agreement) commencing with the fiscal year ending September 30, 2019 and will equal 17.5% of OCSI’s realized capital gains, if any, on a cumulative basis from the
beginning of the fiscal year ending September 30, 2019 through the end of each fiscal year, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fees. Any realized capital gains, realized capital losses, unrealized capital appreciation and unrealized capital depreciation with respect to OCSI’s portfolio as of the end of the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018 will be excluded from the calculations of the second part of the incentive fee.
For purposes of each Investment Advisory Agreement,“pre-incentive fee net investment income” means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees or other fees that the applicable Company receives from portfolio companies, other than fees for providing managerial assistance) accrued during the fiscal quarter, minus operating expenses for the quarter (including the base management fee, expenses payable under the Company’s Administration Agreement (as defined below) and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee).Pre-incentive fee net investment income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount debt instruments withpayment-in-kind interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that the applicable Company has not yet received in cash.Pre-incentive fee net investment income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation.
Each Investment Advisory Agreement may be terminated without penalty, upon 60 days’ written notice, by the vote of a majority50,000 shares (5% of the outstanding voting securities of the applicable Company or by the vote of the applicable Company’s directors or by Oaktree.
Oaktree has entered into atwo-year contractual fee waiver with each Company to waive, to the extent necessary, any management or incentive fees that exceed what would have been paid during that period to Fifth Street Management LLC (the “Former Adviser”) in the aggregate under such Company’s investment advisory agreement with the Former Adviser that was in effect prior to October 17, 2017.
Each Company has entered into an administration agreement with Oaktree Administrator (each, an “Administration Agreement” and together, the “Administration Agreements”), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Oaktree. Pursuant to the Administration Agreements, Oaktree Administrator provides administrative services to each Company necessary for the operations of such Company, which include providing to each Company office facilities, equipment, clerical, bookkeeping and record keeping servicesshares) at such facilities and such other services as Oaktree Administrator, subject to review by the applicable Board, shall from time to time deem to be necessary or useful to perform its obligations under the applicable Administration Agreement. Oaktree Administrator also provides to each Company portfolio collection functions for interest income, fees and warrants and is responsible for the financial and other records that each Company is required to maintain and prepares, prints and disseminates reports to each Company’s stockholders and reports and all other materials filed with the SEC. In addition, Oaktree Administrator assists each Company in determining and publishing each Company’s net asset value, overseeing the preparation and filing of each Company’s tax returns, and generally overseeing the payment of each Company’s$9.50 per share after offering expenses and the performancecommissions (a 5% discount from NAV); (2) an offering of administrative and professional services rendered to each Company by others. Oaktree Administrator may also offer to provide, on the applicable Company’s behalf, managerial assistance to such Company’s portfolio companies. For providing these services, facilities and personnel, each Company reimburses Oaktree Administrator the allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by Oaktree Administrator in performing its obligations under the applicable Administration Agreement, including each Company’s allocable portion of the rent of its principal executive offices at market rates and each Company’s allocable portion of the costs of compensation and related expenses of its chief financial officer and chief compliance officer and their respective staffs and othernon-investment professionals at Oaktree that perform duties for such Company. Such reimbursement is at cost, with no profit to, or markup by, Oaktree Administrator. Each Administration Agreement may be terminated without penalty, upon 60 days’ written notice, by the vote of a majority100,000 shares (10% of the outstanding voting securitiesshares) at $9.00 per share after offering expenses and commissions (a 10% discount from NAV); (3) an offering of 250,000 shares (25% of the applicable Company or by the voteoutstanding shares) at $7.50 per share after offering expenses and commissions (a 25% discount from NAV); and (4) an offering of 250,000 shares (25% of the applicable Company’s directors or by Oaktree Administrator.
Prior to October 17, 2017, each Company was externally managedoutstanding shares) at $0.00 per share after offering expenses and advised by the Former Adviser, and its administrator was FSC CT LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Former Adviser. Messrs. Bernard D. Berman, Patrick J. Dalton, Ivelin M. Dimitrov, Alexander C. Frank, Todd G. Owens and Sandeep K. Khorana, each an interested member of either or both Boards for all or a portion of fiscal year 2017 and prior to October 17, 2017, had a direct or indirect pecuniary interest in the Former Adviser. For fiscal year 2017, OCSL and OCSI incurred investment advisory fees (net of waiver) of approximately $41.8 million and $8.9 million, respectively, under their respective investment advisory agreements with the Former Adviser. For fiscal year 2017, OCSL and OCSI incurred approximately $4.3 million and $1.9 million of administration fees, respectively, under their respective administration agreements with FSC CT LLC. During fiscal year 2017, each Company was party to a license agreement with Fifth Street Capital LLCcommissions (a 100% discount from NAV). The prospectus pursuant to which Fifth Street Capital LLC grantedany discounted offering is made will include a chart for these examples based on the actual number of shares in such offering and the actual discount from the most recently determined NAV. It is not possible to predict the level of market price decline that may occur. These examples are provided for illustrative purposes only.
Example 1 5% Offering at 5% Discount | Example 2 10% Offering at 10% Discount | Example 3 25% Offering at 25% Discount | Example 4 25% Offering at 100% Discount | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prior to Sale Below NAV | Following Sale | % Change | Following Sale | % Change | Following Sale | % Change | Following Sale | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Offering Price | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Price per share to public | — | $ | 10.00 | — | $ | 9.47 | — | $ | 7.89 | — | $ | 0.00 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net offering proceeds per share to issuer | — | $ | 9.50 | — | $ | 9.00 | — | $ | 7.50 | — | $ | 0.00 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Decrease to NAV | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total shares outstanding | 1,000,000 | 1,050,000 | 5.00 | % | 1,100,000 | 10.00 | % | 1,250,000 | 25.00 | % | 1,250,000 | 25.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
NAV per share | 10.00 | $ | 9.98 | (0.20 | )% | $ | 9.91 | (0.90 | )% | $ | 9.50 | (5.00 | )% | $ | 8.00 | (20.00 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||
Dilution to Stockholder A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares held by Stockholder A | — | 500 | — | 1,000 | — | 2,500 | — | 2,500 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage held by Stockholder A | — | 0.05 | % | — | 0.09 | % | — | 0.20 | % | — | 0.20 | % | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Asset Values | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total NAV held by Stockholder A | — | $ | 4,990 | — | $ | 9,910 | — | $ | 23,750 | — | $ | 20,000 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total investment by Stockholder A | — | $ | 5,000 | — | $ | 9,470 | — | $ | 19,725 | — | $ | 0.00 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total (dilution)/accretion to Stockholder A (total NAV less total investment) | — | $ | (10 | ) | — | $ | 440 | — | $ | 4,025 | — | $ | 20,000 | — |
Example 1 5% Offering at 5% Discount | Example 2 10% Offering at 10% Discount | Example 3 25% Offering at 25% Discount | Example 4 25% Offering at 100% Discount | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prior to Sale Below NAV | Following Sale | % Change | Following Sale | % Change | Following Sale | % Change | Following Sale | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Amounts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NAV held by Stockholder A | — | $ | 9.98 | — | $ | 9.91 | — | $ | 9.50 | — | $ | 8.00 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment per share held by Stockholder A | — | $ | 10.00 | — | $ | 9.47 | — | $ | 7.89 | — | $ | 0.00 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dilution)/accretion per share held by Stockholder A (NAV less investment per share) | — | $ | (0.02 | ) | — | $ | 0.44 | — | $ | 1.61 | — | $ | 8.00 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage (dilution)/accretion to Stockholder A ((dilution)/accretion per share divided by investment per share) | — | — | (0.20 | )% | — | 4.65 | % | — | 20.41 | % | — |
Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons
The independent directors of each Companyapproval if the following conditions are required to review, approve or ratify any transactions with related persons (as such term is defined in Item 404 of RegulationS-K).
Material Conflicts of Interest
Each Company’s executive officers, directors and certain members of Oaktree serve or may serve as officers, directors or principals of entities that operate in the same or met:
Oaktree has investment allocation guidelines that govern the allocation of investment opportunities among the investment funds and accounts managedfirst solicitation by orsub-advised by Oaktree and its affiliates. To the extent an investment opportunity is appropriate for OCSL or OCSI or any other investment fund or account managed orsub-advised by Oaktree or its affiliates, Oaktree will adhere to its investment allocation guidelines in order to determine a fair and equitable allocation.
Each of the Companies may invest alongside funds and accounts managed orsub-advised by Oaktree and its affiliates in certain circumstances where doing so is consistent with applicable law and SEC staff interpretations. For example, each of the Companies may invest alongside such accounts consistent with guidance promulgated by the staff of the SEC permitting each such Company and such other accounts to purchase interests in a single class of privately placed securities so long as certain conditions are met, including that Oaktree, acting on behalf of the applicable Company and on behalf of other clients, negotiates no term other than pricefirm commitments to purchase such common stock or terms related to price.
In addition, on October 18, 2017, Oaktree received exemptive relief from the SEC to allow certain managed funds and accounts, each of whose investment adviser is Oaktree or an investment adviser controlling, controlled by or under common control with Oaktree, to participate in negotiatedco-investment transactions where doing so is consistent with the applicable registered fund’s or business development company’s investment objective and strategies as well as regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors, and pursuantimmediately prior to the conditionsissuance of such common stock, that the exemptive relief. Each potentialco-investment opportunity that falls under the termsprice at which such shares of the exemptive relief and is appropriate for either or both Companies and any affiliated fund or account, and satisfies the then-current board-established criteria, will be offered to such Company and such other eligible funds and accounts and reviewed by the applicable Company’sCo-Investment Committee. If there is a sufficient amount of securities to satisfy all participants, the securities will be allocated among the participants in accordance with their proposed order size and if there is an insufficient amount of securities to satisfy all participants, the securities will be allocated pro rata based on the investment proposed by the applicable investment adviser to such participant, up to the amount proposedcommon stock are to be invested by each,sold is not less than a price which is reviewed and approved by an independent committeeclosely approximates the market value of legal, compliance and accounting professionals at Oaktree.
Although Oaktree will endeavor to allocate investment opportunities inthose shares of common stock, less any distributing commission or discount.
Pursuant to each Investment Advisory Agreement, Oaktree’s liability is limited and the applicable Company is required to indemnify Oaktree against certain liabilities. This may lead Oaktree to act in a riskier manner in performing its duties and obligations under the applicable Investment Advisory Agreement than it would if it were acting for its own account, and creates a potential conflict of interest.
Pursuant to each Administration Agreement, Oaktree Administrator furnishes the applicable Company with the facilities, including its principal executive office, and administrative services necessary to conduct itsday-to-day operations. Each Company pays the Oaktree Administrator its allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by the Oaktree Administrator in performing its obligations under the applicable Administration Agreement, including, without limitation, a portion of the rent at market rates and compensation of such Company’s chief financial officer, chief compliance officer, their respective staffs and othernon-investment professionals at Oaktree that perform duties for such Company.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, requires the Companies’ directors and executive officers, and persons who own 10% or moremajority of the Company’s common stock, to file reports of ownershipdirectors who have no financial interest in the transaction and changes in ownership of its equity securities with the SEC. Directors, executive officers and 10% or more holders are required by SEC regulations to furnish each Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on a reviewmajority of the copies of those forms furnished to the applicable Company, or written representations that no such forms were required, each Company believes that itsCompany’s directors executive officers and 10% or more beneficial owners complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017.
Corporate Governance Documents
Each Company maintains a corporate governance webpage under the “Investors” link at https://www.oaktreespecialtylending.com for OCSL and https://www.oaktreestrategicincome.comfor OCSI.
The Corporate Governance Policies, Code of Business Conduct, Joint Code of Ethics, Securities Trading Policy, Audit Committee Charter, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter and Compensation Committee Charter for each Companywho are available at https://www.oaktreespecialtylending.com for OCSL and https://www.oaktreestrategicincome.comfor OCSI and are also available to any stockholder who requests them by writing to Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation or Oaktree Strategic Income Corporation, as applicable, 333 South Grand Avenue, 28th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071, Attention: Secretary.
In accordance with rules of NASDAQ, each Board annually determines the independence of each director. No director is considered independent unless the applicable Board has determined that he or she has no material relationship with the applicable Company. Each Company monitors the status of its directors and officers through the activities of such Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and through a questionnaire to be completed by each director no less frequently than annually, with updates periodically if information provided in the most recent questionnaire has materially changed.
In order to evaluate the materiality of any such relationship, each Board uses the definition of director independence set forth in the NASDAQ listing rules. Section 5605 provides that a director of a business development company shall be considered to be independent if he or she is not an “interested person”persons” of the Company as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. Section 2(a)(19)For these purposes, directors will not be deemed to have a financial interest solely by reason of their ownership of the 1940 Act defines an “interested person”Company’s common stock.
Each Board has determined that eachpotentially dilutive effect of the current directorsissuance of shares of the Company’s common stock at a price that is independentless than NAV per share and has no relationshipthe expenses associated with the Company, exceptsuch issuance. Any sale of common stock at a price below NAV per share would result in an immediate dilution to existing common stockholders who do not participate in such sale on at least a pro rata basis. This dilution would include reduction in NAV per share as a directorresult of the issuance of shares at a price below NAV per share and stockholdera proportionately greater decrease in a stockholder’s interest in the
Each Company’s directors perform an evaluation, no less frequently than annually,potential dilutive effect of the effectivenessissuance of shares of common stock at a price below NAV per share when considering whether to authorize any such Company’s Boardissuance pursuant to the stockholder approval being sought here.
Stockholders and other interested parties may contactthus any member (or all members)future issuance of either Company’s Board by mail. To communicate with either Board,common stock at a price below NAV per share will dilute such stockholders’ holdings of common stock as a percentage of shares outstanding to the extent such stockholders do not purchase sufficient shares of common stock in the offering or otherwise to maintain their percentage interest. Further, if current stockholders of the Company do not purchase any individual directorshares of common stock to maintain their percentage interest, regardless of whether such offering is above or any group or committee of directors, correspondencebelow the then current NAV per share, their voting power will be diluted.
accounting, internal controls and other auditing matters will be directed tonoted that the applicable Company’s Audit Committee. Appropriate personnel of the applicable Company will review and sort through communications before forwarding them to the addressee(s).
OCSL
OCSL’s Board met 15 times during fiscal year 2017. Each director attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the OCSL Board and committees during fiscal year 2017 on which the director served that were held while the director was a member of the Board or such committee, as applicable, with the exception of Patrick J. Dalton who attended 60% of the meetings of the OCSL Board held while he was a member of the OCSL Board. The OCSL Board standing committees are described below. Directors are encouraged to attend each annual meeting of stockholders. Three of OCSL’s then-current directors attended its 2017 annual meeting of stockholders in person.
OCSI
OCSI’s Board met 16 times during fiscal year 2017. Each director attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the OCSI Board and committees during fiscal year 2017 on which the director served that were held while the director was a member of the Board or such committee, as applicable. The OCSI Board standing committees are described below. Directors are encouraged to attend each annual meeting of stockholders. Five of OCSI’s then-current directors attended its 2017 annual meeting of stockholders in person.
Each Company’s Audit Committee is responsible for selecting, engaging and discharging such Company’s independent accountants, reviewing the plans, scope and results of the audit engagement with its independent accountants, approving professional services provided by its independent accountants (including compensation thereof), reviewing the independence of its independent accountants and reviewing the adequacy of its internal control over financial reporting, as well as establishing guidelines and making recommendations to its Board regarding the valuation of its loans and investments. The charter of the OCSL Audit Committee is available at https://www.oaktreespecialtylending.com, and the charter of the OCSI Audit Committee is available at https://www.oaktreestrategicincome.com.
OCSL
The current members of the OCSL Audit Committee are Messrs. Gamsin, Dutkiewicz, Jacobson and Zimmerman, each of whom is not an interested person of OCSL as defined in the 1940 Act and is independent for purposes of the NASDAQ listing rules. Mr. Zimmerman serves as the Chairman of OCSL’s Audit Committee. OCSL’s Board has determined that Messrs. Zimmerman and Dutkiewicz are “audit committee financial experts” as defined under SEC rules. OCSL’s Audit Committee met 10 times during fiscal year 2017.
OCSI
The current members of the OCSI Audit Committee are Messrs. Gamsin, Jacobson and Zimmerman, each of whom is not an interested person of OCSI as defined in the 1940 Act and is independent for purposes of the NASDAQ listing rules. Mr. Zimmerman serves as the Chairman of OCSI’s Audit Committee. OCSI’s Board has determined that Mr. Zimmerman is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under SEC rules. OCSI’s Audit Committee met six times during fiscal year 2017.
Each Company’s Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the reimbursement by such Company of the allocable portion of the compensation of its chief financial officer and chief compliance
officer and their respective staffs and othernon-investment professionals at Oaktree that perform duties for such Company. The charter of the OCSL Compensation Committee is available at https://www.oaktreespecialtylending.com, and the charter of the OCSI Compensation Committee is available at https://www.oaktreestrategicincome.com.
The current members of each Company’s Compensation Committee are Messrs. Gamsin, Jacobson and Ruben, each of whom is not an interested person of such Company as defined in the 1940 Act and is independent for purposes of the NASDAQ listing rules. Mr. Jacobson serves as the Chairman of the OCSL and OCSI Compensation Committees. As discussed below, none of the Companies’ executive officers is directly compensated by the Companies. OCSL’s Compensation Committee met three times during fiscal year 2017, and OCSI’s Compensation Committee met two times during fiscal year 2017.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees
Each Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for determining criteria for service on the applicable Board, identifying, researching and nominating directors for election by its stockholders, selecting nominees to fill vacancies on such Board or a committee of such Board, developing and recommending to such Board a set of corporate governance principles and overseeing the self-evaluation of such Board and its committees and evaluation of management. The charter of the OCSL Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is available at https://www.oaktreespecialtylending.com, and the charter of the OCSI Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is available at https://www.oaktreestrategicincome.com.
The members of each Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Messrs. Gamsin, Ruben and Zimmerman, each of whom is not an interested person of such Company as defined in the 1940 Act and is independent for purposes of the NASDAQ listing rules. Mr. Ruben serves as the Chairman of the OCSL and OCSI Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. OCSL’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met three times during fiscal year 2017, and OCSI’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met two times during the fiscal year 2017.
Each Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers qualified director nominees recommended by stockholders of such Company when such recommendations are submitted in accordance with either such Company’s bylaws and any other applicable law, rule or regulation regarding director nominations. Stockholders of a Company may submit candidates for nomination for such Company’s Board by writing to: Board of Directors, Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation or Oaktree Strategic Income Corporation, as applicable, 333 South Grand Avenue, 28th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071. When submitting a nomination for consideration, a stockholder must provide certain information about each person whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election as a director, including: (i) the name, age, business address and residence address of the person; (ii) the principal occupation or employment of the person; (iii) the class or series andmaximum number of shares of Company common stock owned beneficially or of record by the person; and (iv) any other information relatingissuable below NAV per share that could result in such dilution is limited to the person that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for election of directors pursuant to Section 1425% of the Exchange Act, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. Such notice must be accompanied by the proposed nominee’s written consent to be named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected.
In evaluating director nominees, each Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the following factors:
Each Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s goal is to assembleindependent directors, recommends a Board that brings itvote “FOR” the Proposal.
Other than the foregoing, there are no stated minimum criteria for director nominees, although each Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also consider such other factors as it may deem are in the Company’s best interests and those of its stockholders. Neither Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assigns specific weights to particular criteria, and no particular criterion is necessarily applicable to all prospective nominees. Each Company believes that the backgrounds and qualifications of the directors, considered as a group, should provide a significant composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow each Board to fulfill its responsibilities. The Boards do not have a specific diversity policy, but considers diversity of race, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, disability, cultural background and professional experiences in evaluating candidates for Board membership.
Each Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies nominees by first evaluating the current members of the Board willing to continue in service. Current members of the Board with skills and experience that are relevant to the applicable business and who are willing to continue in service are considered forre-nomination, balancing the value of continuity of service by existing members of the Board with that of obtaining a new perspective. If any member of the Board does not wish to continue in service or if the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee the Board decides not tore-nominate a member forre-election or the Board decides to add a new director to the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee would identify the desired skills and experience of a new nominee in light of the criteria above. Current members of each Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board would review and discuss, for nomination, the individuals meeting the criteria of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Research may also be performed to identify qualified individuals. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of each Company has not, but may choose to, engage an independent consultant or other third party to identify or evaluate or assist in identifying potential nominees to such Company’s Board.
Each Company’sCo-Investment Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving certainco-investment transactions in accordance with the conditions of the exemptive order we received from the SEC. The charter of each Company’sCo-Investment Committee is available in print to any stockholder who requests it.
OCSL
The current members of OCSL’sCo-Investment Committee are Messrs. Dutkiewicz, John B. Frank, Gamsin, Jacobson, Ruben and Zimmerman, each of whom is not an interested person of OCSL as defined in the 1940 Act and is independent for purposes of the NASDAQ listing rules, with the exception of Mr. John B. Frank who is an interested person as defined in the 1940 Act. Mr. Gamsin currently serves as the Chairman of the OCSLCo-Investment Committee.
OCSI
The current members of OCSI’sCo-Investment Committee are Messrs. Cohen, John B. Frank, Gamsin, Jacobson, Ruben and Zimmerman, each of whom is not an interested person of OCSI as defined in the 1940 Act
and is independent for purposes of the NASDAQ listing rules, with the exception of Mr. John B. Frank who is an interested person as defined in the 1940 Act. Mr. Gamsin currently serves as the Chairman of the OCSICo-Investment Committee.
Each Company has adopted a joint Code of Business Conduct which applies to, among others, executive officers, including the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions and all other officers, employees and directors of the Companies. If either Company makes any substantive amendment to, or grants a waiver from, a provision of the Code of Business Conduct, such Company will promptly disclose the nature of the amendment or waiverour Annual Report on its website at https://www.oaktreespecialtylending.com or https://www.oaktreestrategicincome.com, as applicable.
The executive officers of the Companies do not receive direct compensation from the applicable Company. The compensation of the principals and other investment professionals of Oaktree are paid by Oaktree Administrator. Further, each Company is prohibited under the 1940 Act from issuing equity incentive compensation, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and stock, to its officers or directors, or any employees it may have in the future. Compensation paid to each Company’s chief financial officer and chief compliance officer and their respective staffs and othernon-investment professionals at Oaktree that perform duties for each Company is set by Oaktree Administrator and is subject to reimbursement by each Company of an allocable portion of such compensation for services rendered to it.
During fiscal year 2017, OCSL reimbursed FSC CT LLC, its former administrator (the “Former Administrator”), approximately $2.2 million for the allocable portion of compensation expenses incurred by the Former Administrator on behalf of OCSL’s chief financial officer, chief compliance officer and other support personnel, pursuant to its prior administration agreement.
During fiscal year 2017, OCSI reimbursed the Former Administrator approximately $0.7 million for the allocable portion of compensation expenses incurred by the Former Administrator on behalf of OCSI’s chief financial officer, chief compliance officer and other support personnel, pursuant to its prior administration agreement.
The following table sets forth compensation of each Company’s directors for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017:
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1)(2) | Total | |||||||||||||||
Name (Company or Companies) | OCSL | OCSI | OCSL | OCSI | ||||||||||||
Interested Directors: | ||||||||||||||||
Bernard D. Berman (OCSL; OCSI) (3) (4) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Patrick J. Dalton (OCSL; OCSI) (5) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Ivelin M. Dimitrov (OCSL; OCSI) (6) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Alexander C. Frank (OCSL; OCSI) (3) (4) (7) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
John B. Frank (OCSL; OCSI) (8) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Sandeep K. Khorana (OCSL) (9) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Todd G. Owens (OCSL; OCSI) (10) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Independent Directors: | ||||||||||||||||
James Castro-Blanco (OCSL; OCSI) (3) (4) (11) | $ | 167,984 | $ | 98,630 | $ | 167,984 | $ | 98,630 | ||||||||
Richard W. Cohen (OCSI) | — | $ | 97,530 | — | $ | 97,530 | ||||||||||
Brian S. Dunn (OCSL) (3) | $ | 188,061 | — | $ | 188,061 | — | ||||||||||
Richard P. Dutkiewicz (OCSL; OCSI) (4) | $ | 194,880 | $ | 157,783 | $ | 194,880 | $ | 157,783 | ||||||||
Marc H. Gamsin (OCSL; OCSI) (8) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Byron J. Haney (OCSL) (3) | $ | 157,884 | — | $ | 157,884 | — | ||||||||||
Craig Jacobson (OCSL; OCSI) (8) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Jeffrey R. Kay (OCSI) (4) | — | $ | 119,840 | — | $ | 119,840 | ||||||||||
Douglas F. Ray (OCSL; OCSI) (3) | $ | 162,903 | $ | 64,289 | $ | 162,903 | $ | 64,289 | ||||||||
Richard G. Ruben (OCSL;OCSI) (8) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Bruce Zimmerman (OCSL; OCSI) (8) | — | — | — | — |
OCSL
For fiscal year 2017, the independent directors of OCSL each received an annual retainer fee of $100,000, payable once per year2023 to independent directors that attend at least 75%any stockholder upon request. Requests should be directed to Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation, 1301 Avenue of the meetings held the previous fiscal year. In addition, the independent directors of OCSL received $2,500 for each Board meeting in which the director attended in person and $1,000 for each Board meeting in which the director participated other than in person, and reimbursement of reasonableout-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending each Board meeting. The independent directors also received $1,000 for each Board committee meeting in which they attended in person and $500 for each Board committee meeting in which they participated other than in person, and reimbursement of reasonableout-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending a committee meeting not held concurrently with a Board meeting. For fiscal year 2017, the independent directors serving on the OCSLCo-Investment Committee, which was responsible for reviewing and approving certainco-investment transactions under the conditions of an exemptive order received from the SEC, also received $500 for eachCo-Investment Committee meeting in which they attended in person and $300 for eachCo-Investment Committee meeting in which they participated other than in person plus reimbursement of reasonableout-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending eachCo-Investment Committee meeting not held concurrently with a Board meeting.
In addition, for fiscal year 2017, the Chairman of the OCSL Audit Committee received an annual retainer of $25,000, the Chairman of the subcommittee of the OCSL Audit Committee received an annual retainer of $25,000, the Chairman of the OCSL Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the OCSL Compensation Committee each received an annual retainer of $5,000 and the Chairman of the OCSLCo-Investment Committee received an annual retainer of $15,000.No compensation was paid to directors who were interested persons of OCSL as defined in the 1940 Act.
For fiscal year 2018, the independent directors of OCSL will receive an annual retainer fee of $135,000. In addition, the lead independent director will receive $15,000, and the Chair of the Company’s Audit Committee will also receive $15,000. The OCSL Board has also adopted a policy which, over a period of time, requires each independent director to hold Company stock equal to one year’s worth of compensation.
OCSI
For fiscal year 2017, the independent directors of OCSI each received an annual retainer fee of $55,500, payable once per year to independent directors that attendAmericas, 34th Floor, New York, NY 10019, by telephone at least 75% of the meetings held the previous fiscal year. In addition, the independent directors of OCSI received $2,000 for each Board meeting in which the director attended in person and $1,000 for each Board meeting in which the director participated other than in person, and reimbursement of reasonableout-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending each Board meeting. The independent directors also received $1,000 for each Board committee meeting in which they attended in person and $500 for each Board committee meeting in which they participated other than in person, and reimbursement of reasonableout-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending a committee meeting not held concurrently with a Board meeting. For fiscal year 2017, the independent directors serving on the OCSICo-Investment Committee, which was responsible for reviewing and approving certainco-investment transactions under the conditions of the exemptive order received from the SEC, also received $500 for eachCo-Investment Committee meeting in which they attended in person and $300 for eachCo-Investment Committee meeting in which they participated other than in person plus reimbursement of reasonableout-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending eachCo-Investment Committee meeting not held concurrently with a Board meeting.
In addition, for fiscal year 2017, the Chairman of the OCSI Audit Committee received an annual retainer of $25,000, the Chairman of the OCSI Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the OCSI Compensation Committee each received an annual retainer of $2,500 and the Chairman of the OCSICo-Investment Committee received an annual retainer of $15,000.No compensation was paid to directors who were interested persons of OCSI as defined in the 1940 Act.
For fiscal year 2018, the independent directors of OCSI will receive an annual retainer fee of $100,000. In addition, the lead independent director will receive $10,000, and the Chair of the Company’s Audit Committee will also receive $10,000. The OCSI Board has also adopted a policy which, over a period of time, requires each independent director to hold Company stock equal to one year’s worth of compensation.
PROPOSAL 2 — RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE 2018 FISCAL YEAR
Upon the recommendation of each respective Audit Committee of the Boards, each Board has retained EY as such Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018, subject to ratification by each Company’s stockholders.
On January 4, 2018, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) resigned as the independent registered public accounting firm of each Company, and the Audit Committee of each Board accepted the resignation of PwC effective as of that date. PwC served as each Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. The audit reports of PwC on each Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and they were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.
During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 and through January 4, 2018, there were no disagreements between either Company and PwC on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedures which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of PwC, would have caused PwC to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its audit report, and, except as set forth in the following sentence, there were no “reportable events” as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of RegulationS-K for either Company. As previously disclosed in the Companies’ respective Annual Reports on Form10-K for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, management and PwC concluded that each Company had a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting because it did not design or maintain effective controls to internally communicate current accounting policies and procedures, including the nature of supporting documentation required to validate certain portfolio company data, as of each of September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016. Each Audit Committee discussed the material weakness with PwC, and each Company has authorized PwC to respond fully to inquiries of such Company’s successor independent registered public accounting firm concerning this matter. Each Company received a letter from PwC addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating that PwC agrees with the above statements concerning PwC. A copy of PwC’s letters, each dated January 8, 2018, was attached as an exhibit to Form8-Ks filed by each of OCSL and OCSI on January 8, 2018.
Effective January 4, 2018, each Audit Committee engaged EY to serve as such Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 and through January 4, 2018, none of OCSI, OCSL nor anyone on their behalf consulted with EY regarding: (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements; or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a “disagreement” (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of RegulationS-K) or a “reportable event” (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of RegulationS-K). It is expected that a representative of EY will participate in the virtual Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she chooses and will be available to answer questions. It is not expected that a representative of PwC will participate in the virtual Annual Meeting.
The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by PwC for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.
2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||||
OCSL | OCSI | OCSL | OCSI | |||||||||||||
Audit Fees | $ | 2,538,407 | $ | 544,163 | $ | 1,831,710 | $ | 493,601 | ||||||||
Audit-Related Fees | $ | 30,000 | $ | 10,000 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
AggregateNon-Audit Fees: | ||||||||||||||||
Tax Fees | $ | 112,000 | $ | 24,900 | $ | 112,900 | $ | 25,000 | ||||||||
All Other Fees | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Total AggregateNon-Audit Fees | $ | 112,000 | (1) | $ | 24,900 | (2) | $ | 112,900 | (3) | $ | 25,000 | (4) | ||||
Total Fees | $ | 2,680,407 | $ | 579,063 | $ | 1,944,610 | $ | 518,601 |
Audit Fees. Audit fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of each Company’syear-end financial statements and services that are normally provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings.
Audit-Related Fees. Audit-related services consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of each Company’s financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services include attest services that are not required by statute or regulation and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.
Tax Fees. Tax fees consist of fees billed for professional services for tax compliance. These services include assistance regarding federal, state and local tax compliance.
All Other Fees. All other fees would include fees for products and services other than the services reported above.
For each Company, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy is required to approve this proposal. Abstentions will not be included in determining the number of votes cast and, as a result, will have no effect on this proposal. Because brokers will have discretionary authority to vote for the ratification of the selection of each Company’s registered independent public accounting firm in the event that they do not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner of shares of our common stock, there should not be any brokernon-votes with respect to this proposal.
Each Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the applicable Company for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018.
The following is the joint report of the Audit Committees with respect to each Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017.
As part of its oversight of each Company’s financial statements, each Company’s Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with both management and its independent registered public accounting firm the applicable Company’s audited financial statements filed with the SEC as of and for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017. Each Company’s management advised each Audit Committee that all financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and reviewed significant accounting issues with the Audit Committee. Each Company’s Audit Committee discussed with its independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standards No. 16, (Communication with Audit Committees). The independent registered public accounting firm also provided to the Audit Committees of both Companies the written disclosures required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the applicable Company’s Audit Committee concerning independence, and such Audit Committee discussed the subject of independence with the independent registered public accounting firm.
Each Company’s Audit Committee has established apre-approval policy that describes the permitted audit, audit-related, tax and other services to be provided by its independent registered public accounting firm. Pursuant to the policies, each Company’s Audit Committeepre-approves the audit andnon-audit services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm in order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the firm’s independence.
Any requests for audit, audit-related, tax, and other services that have not received generalpre-approval must be submitted to the applicable Company’s Audit Committee for specificpre-approval, irrespective of the amount, and cannot commence until such approval has been granted. Normally,pre-approval is provided at regularly scheduled meetings of the applicable Audit Committee. However, such Audit Committee may delegatepre-approval authority to subcommittees of one or more of its members. The member or members to whom such authority is delegated shall report anypre-approval decisions to the applicable Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. Neither of the Companies’ Audit Committees delegates its responsibilities topre-approve services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm to management.
Each Company’s Audit Committee has reviewed the audit fees paid by such Company to its independent registered public accounting firm. It has also reviewednon-audit services and fees to assure compliance with the applicable Company’s and Audit Committee’s policies restricting the independent registered public accounting firm from performing services that might impair its independence.
Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee of each Company recommended to the applicable Board that the financial statements as of and for the year ended September 30, 2017, be included in each Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended September 30, 2017, for filing with the SEC. Each of the Audit Committees also recommended the selection of EY to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm of the applicable Company for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
SEC rules governing the exercise of this authority.
Each Company’s
We file
*** Exercise Your Right to Vote ***
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on April 6, 2018.
| ||||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR all of the following nominees.
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal.
To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.
| ||
VOTE BY INTERNET | ||
Before The Meeting www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above | ||
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. | ||
During The Meeting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ ocsl2024sm | ||
You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. | ||
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 | ||
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. | ||
VOTE BY MAIL | ||
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. |
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: |
| |||
V27361-S77915 | KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS |
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY | ||||||||||
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. |
OAKTREE SPECIALTY LENDING CORPORATION |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal.
| For | Against | Abstain | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. To | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE VOTED AS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. |
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] | Date | Signature (Joint Owners) | Date |
Special Meeting of
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
E35717-P01438
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation
SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
March 4, 2024 10: (1:30 p.m. Eastern Time) This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors | ||||||||
The undersigned hereby appoints www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ | ||||||||
THIS PROXY IS REVOCABLE AND WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THE REVERSE SIDE. WHERE NO CHOICE IS SPECIFIED, VOTES ENTITLED TO BE CAST BY THE UNDERSIGNED WILL BE CAST FOR | ||||||||
Continued and to be signed on reverse side |
*** Exercise Your Right to Vote ***
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on April 6, 2018.
| ||||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR all of the following nominees.
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal.
To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.
|
|
|
|
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
E35715-P01439
| ||||||||
|